linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 7/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: handle timeouts and failed services differently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230111134513.2495510-8-conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:45:13 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 7/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: handle timeouts and failed services differently

The system controller will only deliver an interrupt if a service
succeeds. This leaves us in the unfortunate position with current code
where there is no way to differentiate between a legitimate timeout
where the service has not completed & where it has completed, but
failed.

mbox_send_message() has its own completion, and it will time out of the
system controller does not lower the busy flag. In this case, a timeout
has occurred and the error can be propagated back to the caller.

If the busy flag is lowered, but no interrupt has arrived to trigger the
rx callback, the service can be deemed to have failed. Report EBADMSG in
this case so that callers can differentiate.

Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
index 4aadd05769d2..75422db75fe5 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
@@ -41,14 +41,25 @@ int mpfs_blocking_transaction(struct mpfs_sys_controller *sys_controller, struct
 	reinit_completion(&sys_controller->c);
 
 	ret = mbox_send_message(sys_controller->chan, msg);
-	if (ret < 0)
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_warn(sys_controller->client.dev,
+			 "MPFS sys controller service timeout\n");
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	ret = 0; /* mbox_send_message returns postitive integers on success */
+
+	/*
+	 * Unfortunately, the system controller will only deliver an interrupt
+	 * if a service succeeds. mbox_send_message() will block until the busy
+	 * flag is gone. If the busy flag is gone but no interrupt has arrived
+	 * to trigger the rx callback then the service can be deemed to have
+	 * failed.
+	 */
 	if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, timeout)) {
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+		ret = -EBADMSG;
 		dev_warn(sys_controller->client.dev,
-			 "MPFS sys controller transaction timeout\n");
+			 "MPFS sys controller service failed\n");
 	}
 
 out:
@@ -106,6 +117,7 @@ static int mpfs_sys_controller_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	sys_controller->client.dev = dev;
 	sys_controller->client.rx_callback = rx_callback;
 	sys_controller->client.tx_block = 1U;
+	sys_controller->client.tx_tout = msecs_to_jiffies(MPFS_SYS_CTRL_TIMEOUT_MS);
 
 	sys_controller->chan = mbox_request_channel(&sys_controller->client, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(sys_controller->chan)) {
-- 
2.39.0