[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <265a3900-45df-1b9a-b8de-85ef6d25141d@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:14:37 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>, David.Laight@...lab.com,
carlos@...hat.com, Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@...gle.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip] selftests/rseq: Revert "selftests/rseq: Add
mm_numa_cid to test script"
On 2023-01-11 09:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:35:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up
>> into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be
>> reverted.
>>
>> This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f.
>
> Oh my bad, I got confused between the regular numa_id (which I did do
> merge, right?) and the fancy numa_cid, which I indeed didn't merge yet.
Yes, that's indeed what happened.
> I meant to give that a wee bit more thought, but that sadly hasn't
> happened yet :/
>
> Applied, thanks!
No worries, let me know when you have time to discuss the fancy numa_cid
some more.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists