[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y74edWvIF6I40ANt@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:27:01 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
johnson.wang@...iatek.com, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
fparent@...libre.com, chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com,
sam.shih@...iatek.com, y.oudjana@...tonmail.com,
nfraprado@...labora.com, rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com,
ryder.lee@...nel.org, daniel@...rotopia.org,
jose.exposito89@...il.com, yangyingliang@...wei.com,
pablo.sun@...iatek.com, msp@...libre.com, weiyi.lu@...iatek.com,
ikjn@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/23] clk: mediatek: mt8173: Remove
mtk_clk_enable_critical()
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:32:34PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 30/12/22 05:58, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 5:43 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The entire point of mtk_clk_enable_critical() is to raise the refcount
> > > of some clocks so that they won't be turned off during runtime, but
> > > this is the same as what the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag does.
> > >
> > > Set CLK_IS_CRITICAL on all of the critical clocks and remove the
> > > aforementioned function as a cleanup.
> > >
> > > No functional changes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> >
> >
> > Looks good to me,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> >
> > However, if you move this patch before the previous one ...
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c | 41 ++++++++++++-------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c
> > > index 70cdc0719658..02231f8ba6d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c
>
> > > @@ -846,23 +852,8 @@ static const struct mtk_clk_rst_desc clk_rst_desc[] = {
> > > }
> > > };
> > >
> > > -static struct clk_hw_onecell_data *mt8173_top_clk_data;
> > > -static struct clk_hw_onecell_data *mt8173_pll_clk_data;
> >
> > You wouldn't have to touch these lines twice?
> >
>
> That's true, but please, I prefer not to, as the patches are ordered for
> eas(y/ier) bisectability in case anything happens.
Got it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists