[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63d8e95e-894c-4268-648e-35e504ea80b6@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:49:30 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, asml.silence@...il.com
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Add NULL checks for current->io_uring
On 1/11/23 3:19 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> As described in a previous commit 998b30c3948e, current->io_uring could
> be NULL, and thus a NULL check is required for this variable.
>
> In the same way, other functions that access current->io_uring also
> require NULL checks of this variable.
This seems odd. Have you actually seen traces of this, or is it just
based on "guess it can be NULL sometimes, check it in all spots"?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists