[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0406e96b-56fc-d9bd-6ef8-88157ce64e1f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 21:06:15 -0800
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, ruscur@...sell.cc, oohall@...il.com,
treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, mmaddireddy@...dia.com,
kthota@...dia.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vsethi@...dia.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sagar.tv@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] PCI/AER: Configure ECRC only AER is native
On 1/11/23 8:59 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>
>
> On 1/12/2023 9:18 AM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> On 1/11/23 7:33 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>> I think we still need bios option. For example, consider a system where BIOS needs to keep ECRC enabled for integrity reasons but if kernel doesn't want it for perf reasons, then, kernel can always use 'ecrc=off' option.
>>
>> I agree that "on" and "off" option makes sense. Since the kernel defaults ecrc setting to "bios", why again allow it as a command line option?
>
> Agree. "on" and "off" are fine but "default" is redundant. Do you want me to push a change to remove that as part of this patch itself? I think
> it is more like a cleanup and should go separately.
IMO, the "bios" option cleanup and command line update from Bjorn can be in one patch, and your change could be a separate patch. But it is
up to you and Bjorn.
>
>>
>> --
>> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists