[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8ACVykpY11Sq/Pg@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:51:35 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr, sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
wangjie125@...wei.com, corbet@....net, lkp@...el.com,
gal@...dia.com, gustavoars@...nel.org, bagasdotme@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] plca.c: fix obvious mistake in checking
retval
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 06:30:48PM +0100, Piergiorgio Beruto wrote:
> This patch addresses a wrong fix that was done during the review
> process. The intention was to substitute "if(ret < 0)" with
> "if(ret)". Unfortunately, in this specific file the intended fix did not
> meet the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists