[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8AKAZMq7YzOpwwV@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:24:17 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/6] arm64/perf: Add BRBE registers and fields
Hi Anshuman,
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:40:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This adds BRBE related register definitions and various other related field
> macros there in. These will be used subsequently in a BRBE driver which is
> being added later on.
I haven't verified the specific values, but this looks good to me aside from
one minor nit below.
[...]
> +# This is just a dummy register declaration to get all common field masks and
> +# shifts for accessing given BRBINF contents.
> +Sysreg BRBINF_EL1 2 1 8 0 0
We don't need a dummy declaration, as we have 'SysregFields' that can be used
for this, e.g.
SysregFields BRBINFx_EL1
...
EndSysregFields
... which will avoid accidental usage of the register encoding. Note that I've
also added an 'x' there in place of the index, which we do for other registers,
e.g. TTBRx_EL1.
Could you please update to that?
With that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists