[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAEAJfBuA=gTpyeKs5mj0_1z+x5sZhse2OGPP5nmb5E6XNjBKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:55:07 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Collabora Kernel-domain <kernel@...labora.com>,
Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] staging: media: rkvdec: Block start streaming
until both queues run
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:56 AM Sebastian Fricke
<sebastian.fricke@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Ensure that both the CAPTURE and the OUTPUT queue are running (e.g. busy
> -> have buffers allocated) before starting the actual streaming process.
>
Usually, you want to write the "why" in the commit description,
instead of the "what",
which is (hopefully) more or less clear by reading the commit change.
The commit description should have enough information to understand
what is the impact of merging the commit (or what is the bug without
the merging the commit).
If you are fixing a spec violation, adding a reference to the spec is important,
if you are fixing a v4l2-compliance, pasting the error, etc.
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
> index c849f6c20279..e0e95d06e216 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,13 @@ static int rkvdec_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int count)
> if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_CAPTURE(q->type))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure that both the output and the capture queue are running
> + */
> + if (rkvdec_queue_busy(ctx, V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE) == 0 ||
> + rkvdec_queue_busy(ctx, V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE) == 0)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
IIRC, this is already handled by Videobuf2 core, see the comment for
vb2_start_streaming,
in drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c. There's also a
!q->num_buffers check
in vb2_core_streamon.
In general, if you see some kind of bug in a generic logic like this,
it's a red flag that something is wrong at the core level.
Thanks!
Ezequiel
> desc = ctx->coded_fmt_desc;
> if (WARN_ON(!desc))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists