[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230112150204.GA11315@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 16:02:04 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] iov_iter, block: Make bio structs pin pages
rather than ref'ing if appropriate
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:58:49PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> That's kind of what I'm doing - though I've left out the else just in case the
> VM decides to indicate back both FOLL_GET and FOLL_PIN. I'm not sure why it
> would but...
It really can't - they are exclusive. Maybe we need an assert for that
somewhere, but we surely shouldn't try to deal with it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists