[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230112153704.6d37dygm4yfexdq6@builder.lan>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:37:04 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Ensure only freq-domain regs are
counted in num_domains
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:51:25PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> In preparation for CPRh-aware OSM programming, change the probe
> function so that we determine the number of frequency domains by
> counting the number of reg-names entries that begin with
> "freq-domain", as the aforementioned changes require introduction
> of non-freq-domain register spaces.
>
Requiring reg-names would break backwards compatibility with at least
sc7280 and sm6115.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Fixes: 1a6a8b0080b0 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix reading "reg" with address/size-cells != 2")
> Fixes: 054a3ef683a1 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index 9505a812d6a1..89d5ed267399 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -651,8 +651,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *soc_node;
> struct device *cpu_dev;
> + const char *reg_name;
> struct clk *clk;
> - int ret, i, num_domains, reg_sz;
> + int ret, i, num_reg_names, num_domains = 0;
>
> clk = clk_get(dev, "xo");
> if (IS_ERR(clk))
> @@ -684,19 +685,32 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!soc_node)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(soc_node, "#address-cells", ®_sz);
> - if (ret)
> + num_reg_names = of_property_count_strings(dev->of_node, "reg-names");
> + if (num_reg_names <= 0) {
> + ret = num_reg_names ? num_reg_names : -ENODATA;
> goto of_exit;
> + }
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(soc_node, "#size-cells", &i);
> - if (ret)
> - goto of_exit;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_reg_names; i++) {
> + ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "reg-names", i, ®_name);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto of_exit;
>
> - reg_sz += i;
> + /*
> + * Check if the i-th reg is a freq-domain base, no need to add 1
> + * more byte for idx, as sizeof counts \0 whereas strlen does not.
> + */
> + if (strlen(reg_name) == sizeof("freq-domain")) {
> + /* Check if this reg-name begins with "freq-domain" */
> + if (!strncmp(reg_name, "freq-domain", sizeof("freq-domain") - 1))
> + num_domains++;
> + }
> + }
>
> - num_domains = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, "reg", sizeof(u32) * reg_sz);
> - if (num_domains <= 0)
> - return num_domains;
> + if (num_domains <= 0) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto of_exit;
> + }
>
> qcom_cpufreq.data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct qcom_cpufreq_data) * num_domains,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 2.39.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists