[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230112030216.GB17118@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:02:16 -0800
From: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/159] 6.1.5-rc1 review
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:02:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.5 release.
> There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:59:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL x86_64 or WSL arm64
Built, booted, and compared dmesg against 6.1.4. Also haven't
encountered any problems so far using 6.1.y compared to 5.15.y on WSL.
:)
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@...ux.microsoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists