lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4392f40-74bc-77c1-6058-941a7788fb02@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:08:08 -0500
From:   Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>
To:     Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
        nicholas.kazlauskas@....com, hongao <hongao@...ontech.com>
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        sunpeng.li@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
        Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
        aurabindo.pillai@....com, roman.li@....com, Jerry.Zuo@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix set scaling doesn's work



On 1/11/23 10:19, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 1/10/23 10:58, Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/22/22 06:20, hongao wrote:
>>> [Why]
>>> Setting scaling does not correctly update CRTC state. As a result
>>> dc stream state's src (composition area) && dest (addressable area)
>>> was not calculated as expected. This causes set scaling doesn's work.
>>>
>>> [How]
>>> Correctly update CRTC state when setting scaling property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: hongao <hongao@...ontech.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> index 3e1ecca72430..a88a6f758748 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> @@ -9386,8 +9386,8 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>                goto fail;
>>>            }
>>>    -        if (dm_old_con_state->abm_level !=
>>> -            dm_new_con_state->abm_level)
>>> +        if (dm_old_con_state->abm_level != dm_new_con_state->abm_level ||
>>> +            dm_old_con_state->scaling != dm_new_con_state->scaling)
>>>                new_crtc_state->connectors_changed = true;
>>>        }
>>>    
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This change lgtm, and I also run it in our CI, and from IGT perspective, we are good.
>>
>> Harry, do you have any comment about this change?
>>
> 
> LGTM
> 
> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
> 
> Harry
> 
>> Thanks
>> Siqueira
> 

Thanks, patch applied to amd-staging-drm-next.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ