[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230113031921.64716-5-bhe@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:19:18 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, urezki@...il.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/vmalloc: explicitly identify vm_map_ram area when shown in /proc/vmcoreinfo
Now, by marking VMAP_RAM in vmap_area->flags for vm_map_ram, we can
clearly differentiate it with other vmalloc areas. So identify
vm_map_area area by checking VMAP_RAM of vmap_area->flags when shown
in /proc/vmcoreinfo.
Meanwhile, the code comment above vm_map_ram area checking in s_show()
is not needed any more, remove it here.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 13875bc41e27..4a10b3b692fa 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4225,11 +4225,7 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
va = list_entry(p, struct vmap_area, list);
- /*
- * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !vm on behalf
- * of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation.
- */
- if (!va->vm) {
+ if (!va->vm && (va->flags & VMAP_RAM)) {
seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
va->va_end - va->va_start);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists