[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7498a6b1-01d0-0e12-82d3-c75250e09161@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 00:32:49 +0800
From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@....com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Add metrics for neoverse-n2-v2
在 2023/1/13 下午5:59, John Garry 写道:
> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote:
>> Changes since v6:
>> - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian.
>> - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle,
>> per John's suggestion;
>> - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak
>> function, per John's suggestion;
>> - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion.
>> - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$
>
> This looks fine. But for this code:
>
> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote:
>> +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
>> +{
>> + char path[PATH_MAX];
>> + unsigned long long slots = 0;
>
> I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that.
>
Ok, I like this way too.
> For series:
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Thank you very much indeed!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists