[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1782f36-5a28-1fe4-47d5-b3bc00317b57@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 17:33:46 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
agross@...nel.org
Cc: marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add SM4250
support"
On 13/01/2023 16:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> SM4250 and SM6115 use a shared device tree and the RPMPDs are
> identical. There's no need for a separate entry, so remove it.
>
> This reverts commit 45ac44ed10e58cf9b510e6552317ed7d2602346f.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 -
> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 10 ----------
> 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> index 633d49884019..5bb9f59d196f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ properties:
> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
> - - qcom,sm4250-rpmpd
Yet, dedicated compatibles are usually recommended. Maybe this should be
used with fallback:
"qcom,sm4250-rpmpd", "qcom,sm6115-rpmpd"
?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists