linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Remove ipmmu_utlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8G06onFowE3ZIy8@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:45:46 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Remove ipmmu_utlb_disable()

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 08:25:17PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:12:21PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > I'm surprised the 0-day bot didn't notice?
> 
> Well, I think 0-day does not spend that much time on iommu patch-sets,
> especially doing randconfigs or allyes/modconfigs.

Intel folks, can you check on this with the 0-day team? Perhaps since
the list was moved it is not properly subscribed.

> In general it is a good idea to at least compile-test every file that is
> changed in a patch-set before sending it out and not rely on 0-day bot
> for that.

Against every arch combination? This is why we have automation bots :(

Jason