lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 13:53:44 -0600
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y 2/4] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: fix memleak on probe deferral

Quoting Johan Hovold (2023-01-12 23:57:39)
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:54:03PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > From: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> >
> > commit 2de8a325b1084330ae500380cc27edc39f488c30 upstream.
> >
> > Switch to using the device-managed of_iomap helper to avoid leaking
> > memory on probe deferral and driver unbind.
> >
> > Note that this helper checks for already reserved regions and may fail
> > if there are multiple devices claiming the same memory.
>
> This bit turned out to catch some buggy bindings and dts, so if you want
> to backport this one then the corresponding fixes for that would be
> needed as well.
>
> That includes
>
>         a5d6b1ac56cb ("phy: qcom-qmp-usb: fix memleak on probe deferral")
>
> and some dts fixes which likely already have been backported.
>
> It may even be preferred to keep to just skip this patch and keep those
> small memory leaks on probe deferral to not risk any regressions in
> stable.

I only see qcom,sm8350-qmp-usb3-uni-phy in the stable tree and that
hasn't been changed since the node was introduced. I'll try to port the
exclusive logic from a5d6b1ac56cb into this patch. I don't think it's
preferable to keep the memory leak.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ