linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/783] 5.10.163-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:34:20 -0800
From:   Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/783] 5.10.163-rc1 review

On 1/13/23 3:26 PM, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 1/12/23 5:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.163 release.
>> There are 783 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.163-rc1.gz 
>>
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
>> linux-5.10.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
>
> Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
>
Oops, replied to the wrong e-mail. Please ignore.