[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85925bce-f30a-b2df-309f-bd4b510a117c@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 23:37:03 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>,
Rafael J Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Perry.Yuan@....com,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@....com>, gautham.shenoy@....com
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
santosh.shukla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing
support
On 1/12/23 23:21, Wyes Karny wrote:
> Currently writing of min and max perf register is deferred in
> cppc_set_perf function. In CPPC guided mode, these registers needed to
> be written to guide PMFW about min and max perf levels. Add this support
This is generic code, so I think rather than PMFW you should just say
"the platform".
> to make guided mode work properly on shared memory systems.
on AMD shared memory systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
With the commit message cleaned up:
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index 02d83c807271..c936ff503965 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_enable);
> int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> {
> struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpu);
> - struct cpc_register_resource *desired_reg;
> + struct cpc_register_resource *desired_reg, *min_perf_reg, *max_perf_reg;
> int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
> struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -1498,6 +1498,8 @@ int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> }
>
> desired_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF];
> + min_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[MIN_PERF];
> + max_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[MAX_PERF];
>
> /*
> * This is Phase-I where we want to write to CPC registers
> @@ -1506,7 +1508,7 @@ int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> * Since read_lock can be acquired by multiple CPUs simultaneously we
> * achieve that goal here
> */
> - if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) {
> + if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg)) {
> if (pcc_ss_id < 0) {
> pr_debug("Invalid pcc_ss_id\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1529,13 +1531,11 @@ int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> cpc_desc->write_cmd_status = 0;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Skip writing MIN/MAX until Linux knows how to come up with
> - * useful values.
> - */
> cpc_write(cpu, desired_reg, perf_ctrls->desired_perf);
> + cpc_write(cpu, min_perf_reg, perf_ctrls->min_perf);
> + cpc_write(cpu, max_perf_reg, perf_ctrls->max_perf);
>
> - if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg))
> + if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg))
> up_read(&pcc_ss_data->pcc_lock); /* END Phase-I */
> /*
> * This is Phase-II where we transfer the ownership of PCC to Platform
> @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> * case during a CMD_READ and if there are pending writes it delivers
> * the write command before servicing the read command
> */
> - if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) {
> + if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg)) {
> if (down_write_trylock(&pcc_ss_data->pcc_lock)) {/* BEGIN Phase-II */
> /* Update only if there are pending write commands */
> if (pcc_ss_data->pending_pcc_write_cmd)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists