linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: sram: Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f43e320-b533-e5fb-3886-1b6ccc7f9548@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:52:50 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: sram: Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

On 13/01/2023 08:30, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> This patch introduces bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx
> platforms. As of now TCM addresses are hardcoded in xilinx remoteproc
> driver. This bindings will help in defining TCM in device-tree and
> make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven from the driver.
> 

Subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The "dt-bindings"
prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

Where is driver or DTS? Are you now adding a dead binding without users?

Best regards,
Krzysztof