[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230113082659.65276-3-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:26:58 +0800
From: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
To: rppt@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] memblock: Make finding index faster when modify regions.
We can use binary search to find the index to modify regions in
memblock_add_range() and memblock_isolate_range(). Because the
arrangement of regions is ordered. It may be faster when there are
many regions. So implemented a binary search and a new macro to walk
regions.
Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>
---
mm/memblock.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 6eedcfc5dcc1..cb92770ac22e 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -149,6 +149,11 @@ static __refdata struct memblock_type *memblock_memory = &memblock.memory;
i < memblock_type->cnt; \
i++, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[i])
+#define for_each_memblock_type_start(i, start, memblock_type, rgn) \
+ for (i = start, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[i]; \
+ i < memblock_type->cnt; \
+ i++, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[i])
+
#define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
do { \
if (memblock_debug) \
@@ -181,6 +186,24 @@ static unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_addrs_overlap(phys_addr_t base1, p
return ((base1 < (base2 + size2)) && (base2 < (base1 + size1)));
}
+/*
+ * Binary search for the first region not to the left of @base.
+ */
+static unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_lower_bound_region(struct memblock_type *type,
+ phys_addr_t base)
+{
+ unsigned long idx, low_idx = 0, high_idx = type->cnt;
+
+ while (low_idx < high_idx) {
+ idx = (low_idx + high_idx) >> 1;
+ if (type->regions[idx].base + type->regions[idx].size <= base)
+ low_idx = idx + 1;
+ else
+ high_idx = idx;
+ }
+ return low_idx;
+}
+
bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
@@ -581,7 +604,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
bool insert = false;
phys_addr_t obase = base;
phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
- int idx, nr_new;
+ int idx, start_idx, nr_new;
struct memblock_region *rgn;
if (!size)
@@ -607,6 +630,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
*/
if (type->cnt * 2 + 1 <= type->max)
insert = true;
+ start_idx = memblock_lower_bound_region(type, base);
repeat:
/*
@@ -617,7 +641,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
base = obase;
nr_new = 0;
- for_each_memblock_type(idx, type, rgn) {
+ for_each_memblock_type_start(idx, start_idx, type, rgn) {
phys_addr_t rbase = rgn->base;
phys_addr_t rend = rbase + rgn->size;
@@ -737,7 +761,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
int *start_rgn, int *end_rgn)
{
phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
- int idx;
+ int idx, start_idx;
struct memblock_region *rgn;
*start_rgn = *end_rgn = 0;
@@ -750,7 +774,8 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
if (memblock_double_array(type, base, size) < 0)
return -ENOMEM;
- for_each_memblock_type(idx, type, rgn) {
+ start_idx = memblock_lower_bound_region(type, base);
+ for_each_memblock_type_start(idx, start_idx, type, rgn) {
phys_addr_t rbase = rgn->base;
phys_addr_t rend = rbase + rgn->size;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists