[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7cb96551-094c-1a68-cc3f-31e4e2e94518@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 13:04:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
gpiccoli@...lia.com, corbet@....net, tony.luck@...el.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: reserved-memory: ramoops: Update the
binding
Subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The "dt-bindings" prefix
is already stating that these are bindings.
Your subject says nothing. Everything is "update".
On 13/01/2023 12:58, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Update the ramoops region binding document with details
> like region can also be reserved dynamically apart from
> reserving it statically.
So what exactly can be here reserved dynamically? And what does it mean
'dynamically'? By whom? How is this property of hardware (not OS)?
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Change in v2:
> - Added this patch as per changes going to be done in patch 3/3
>
> .../bindings/reserved-memory/ramoops.yaml | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/ramoops.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/ramoops.yaml
> index 0391871..54e46e8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/ramoops.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/ramoops.yaml
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ description: |
> ramoops provides persistent RAM storage for oops and panics, so they can be
> recovered after a reboot. This is a child-node of "/reserved-memory", and
> is named "ramoops" after the backend, rather than "pstore" which is the
> - subsystem.
> + subsystem. This region can be reserved both statically or dynamically by
> + using appropriate property in device tree.
>
> Parts of this storage may be set aside for other persistent log buffers, such
> as kernel log messages, or for optional ECC error-correction data. The total
> @@ -112,7 +113,13 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> required:
> - compatible
> - - reg
> +
> +oneOf:
> + - required:
> + - reg
> +
> + - required:
> + - size
There is no such property. You cannot require it.
>
> anyOf:
> - required: [record-size]
> @@ -142,3 +149,26 @@ examples:
> };
> };
> };
> +
> + - |
> + / {
> + compatible = "foo";
> + model = "foo";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + ramoops: ramoops_region {
Node names should be generic, no underscores in node names.
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
Any reason in naming it differently then existing one? You have there
example.
> + compatible = "ramoops";
> + alloc-ranges = <0x0 0x00000000 0xffffffff 0xffffffff>;
> + size = <0x0 0x10000>; /* 64kB */
> + console-size = <0x8000>; /* 32kB */
> + record-size = <0x400>; /* 1kB */
> + ecc-size = <16>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists