[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0661e73f-9420-9a0a-ef46-15b54a3b5357@skogtun.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:08:47 +0100
From: Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>
Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should we orphan JFS?
Christoph Hellwig [13/01/2023 06.42]:
> Hi all,
>
> A while ago we've deprecated reiserfs and scheduled it for removal.
> Looking into the hairy metapage code in JFS I wonder if we should do
> the same. While JFS isn't anywhere as complicated as reiserfs, it's
> also way less used and never made it to be the default file system
> in any major distribution. It's also looking pretty horrible in
> xfstests, and with all the ongoing folio work and hopeful eventual
> phaseout of buffer head based I/O path it's going to be a bit of a drag.
> (Which also can be said for many other file system, most of them being
> a bit simpler, though).
The Norwegian ISP/TV provider used to have IPTV-boxes which had JFS on
the hard disk that was used to record TV programmes.
However, I don't think these boxes are used anymore.
--
Hilsen Harald
Powered by blists - more mailing lists