[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8I9MAd0zjvR0sQe@google.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 14:27:12 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] zsmalloc: make zspage chain size configurable
On (23/01/13 11:57), Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > This turns hard coded limit on maximum number of physical
> > pages per-zspage into a config option. It also increases the default
> > limit from 4 to 8.
> >
> > Sergey Senozhatsky (4):
> > zsmalloc: rework zspage chain size selection
> > zsmalloc: skip chain size calculation for pow_of_2 classes
> > zsmalloc: make zspage chain size configurable
> > zsmalloc: set default zspage chain size to 8
> >
> > Documentation/mm/zsmalloc.rst | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > mm/Kconfig | 19 ++++
> > mm/zsmalloc.c | 72 +++++----------
> > 3 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Sergey,
Hi Mike,
> The following BUG shows up after this series in linux-next. I can easily
> recreate by doing the following:
>
> # echo large_value > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
> where 'large_value' is a so big that there could never possibly be that
> many 2MB huge pages in the system.
Hmm... Are we sure this is related? I really cannot see how chain-size
can have an effect on zspage ->isolate counter. What chain-size value
do you use? You don't see problems with chain size of 4?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists