[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVK2Q22me0LtvuHk5WJ6n18jfFBBNVeis2k4KbwEMoDiEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:29:35 +0800
From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Sven Schwermer <sven.schwermer@...ruptive-technologies.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: leds: add worldsemi,ws2812b
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:57 PM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
> [...]
> So the description is for 'this device' rather than any re-use.
>
> And the handling of this property is only contained in your driver?
>
> In which case, my understanding is that you should use a prefix.
(Just out of curiosity. I don't want this property now.)
My understanding is that a vendor prefix means this property
is for devices by this vendor. However color-index is for supporting
clones, which are chips not made by this vendor. Does a vendor
prefix really apply in this case?
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists