[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c039de1b-0412-320c-8e91-d74ab1ffbc02@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 14:29:46 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/30] arm64: cpufeature: Use kstrtobool() instead of
strtobool()
Le 02/11/2022 à 14:46, Catalin Marinas a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:14:12PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
>> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
>>
>> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
>> the other function name.
>>
>> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
Hi,
This has been A-b 2 months ago, and I've just resent patches in this
serie that have neither been merged in -next, nor A-b or R-b.
So for this one, it is just a polite reminder. :)
Do you have visibility on when it should be merged?
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists