[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8LedfOqSQrTPzGl@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 11:55:17 -0500
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"parri.andrea" <parri.andrea@...il.com>, will <will@...nel.org>,
"boqun.feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, npiggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
dhowells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"j.alglave" <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
"luc.maranget" <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, akiyks <akiyks@...il.com>,
dlustig <dlustig@...dia.com>, joel <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
urezki <urezki@...il.com>,
quic_neeraju <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
frederic <frederic@...nel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Internal vs. external barriers (was: Re: Interesting LKMM litmus
test)
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:07:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> What Alan said! You could even have distinct partially overlapping
> grace periods, as the Linux kernel actually does have courtesy of normal
> grace periods via synchronize_rcu() and expedited grace periods via
> synchronize_rcu_expedited().
Or just two different CPUs making overlapping calls to
synchronize_rcu().
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists