[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aef753a5-e8b1-5b7b-1b9e-e92a84de15bd@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 16:27:36 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: geni-se: Fix '#address-cells' &
'#size-cells' related dt-binding error
On 13/01/2023 21:10, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Fix the following '#address-cells' & '#size-cells' related
> dt-binding error:
>
> $ make dtbs_check
>
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dtb: geniqup@...0000:
> #address-cells:0:0: 2 was expected
> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml
Don't we want rather to unify the soc address range?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists