[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8RjZQBqWxug5nn8@osiris>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 21:34:45 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/ipl: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()
(second step)
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 04:08:22PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
>
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is similar to the serie ([1]) that tries to axed all usages
> of strtobool().
> Most of the patches have been merged in -next.
>
> Commit d9b25bdf57e4 ("s390/ipl: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()")
> already fixed this file, but a new usage has been introduce by commit
> 87fd22e0ae92 ("s390/ipl: add eckd support").
>
> This patch has been cross-compiled with make.cross.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists