[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230115235202.24695-1-bhuwz@163.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 07:52:02 +0800
From: Vincent Wang <bhuwz@....com>
To: rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Wang <vincentwang3@...ovo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Send CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification after the perf domain creation.
From: Vincent Wang <vincentwang3@...ovo.com>
We found the following issue during kernel boot on android phone:
[ 1.325272][ T1] cpu cpu0: EM: created perf domain
[ 1.329317][ T1] cpu cpu4: EM: created perf domain
[ 1.337597][ T76] pd_init: no EM found for CPU7
[ 1.350849][ T1] cpu cpu7: EM: created perf domain
pd init for cluster2 is executed in a kworker thread and
is earlier than the perf domain creation for cluster2.
pd_init() is called from the cpufreq notification of
CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY in cpufreq_online(), which is earlier
than that cpufreq_driver->register_em() is called.
To avoid this issue, cpufreq notification should be sent after
the perf domain creation.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Wang <vincentwang3@...ovo.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 7e56a42750ea..af8836069398 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1430,9 +1430,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
policy->max_freq_req = NULL;
goto out_destroy_policy;
}
-
- blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
- CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
}
if (cpufreq_driver->get && has_target()) {
@@ -1506,6 +1503,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
*/
if (cpufreq_driver->register_em)
cpufreq_driver->register_em(policy);
+
+ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
+ CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
}
ret = cpufreq_init_policy(policy);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists