linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 15/21] kselftest/arm64: Cover ZT in the FP stress test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221208-arm64-sme2-v4-15-f2fa0aef982f@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:04:50 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@....com>,
        Luis Machado <luis.machado@....com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/21] kselftest/arm64: Cover ZT in the FP stress test

Hook up the newly added zt-test program in the FPSIMD stress tests, start
a copy per CPU when SME2 is supported.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
index f8b2f41aac36..520385fcfede 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
@@ -370,6 +370,19 @@ static void start_za(struct child_data *child, int vl, int cpu)
 	ksft_print_msg("Started %s\n", child->name);
 }
 
+static void start_zt(struct child_data *child, int cpu)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = asprintf(&child->name, "ZT-%d", cpu);
+	if (ret == -1)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg("asprintf() failed\n");
+
+	child_start(child, "./zt-test");
+
+	ksft_print_msg("Started %s\n", child->name);
+}
+
 static void probe_vls(int vls[], int *vl_count, int set_vl)
 {
 	unsigned int vq;
@@ -426,6 +439,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	bool all_children_started = false;
 	int seen_children;
 	int sve_vls[MAX_VLS], sme_vls[MAX_VLS];
+	bool have_sme2;
 	struct sigaction sa;
 
 	while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "t:", options, NULL)) != -1) {
@@ -458,6 +472,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		sme_vl_count = 0;
 	}
 
+	if (getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_SME2) {
+		tests += cpus;
+		have_sme2 = true;
+	} else {
+		have_sme2 = false;
+	}
+
 	/* Force context switching if we only have FPSIMD */
 	if (!sve_vl_count && !sme_vl_count)
 		fpsimd_per_cpu = 2;
@@ -468,8 +489,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	ksft_print_header();
 	ksft_set_plan(tests);
 
-	ksft_print_msg("%d CPUs, %d SVE VLs, %d SME VLs\n",
-		       cpus, sve_vl_count, sme_vl_count);
+	ksft_print_msg("%d CPUs, %d SVE VLs, %d SME VLs, SME2 %s\n",
+		       cpus, sve_vl_count, sme_vl_count,
+		       have_sme2 ? "present" : "absent");
 
 	if (timeout > 0)
 		ksft_print_msg("Will run for %ds\n", timeout);
@@ -527,6 +549,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 			start_ssve(&children[num_children++], sme_vls[j], i);
 			start_za(&children[num_children++], sme_vls[j], i);
 		}
+
+		if (have_sme2)
+			start_zt(&children[num_children++], i);
 	}
 
 	/*

-- 
2.34.1