linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kvm: fix SRCU locking order docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c08f1e98-03fe-1996-bc2c-43d90ec78613@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 18:37:51 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        seanjc@...gle.com, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kvm: fix SRCU locking order docs

On 1/13/23 11:33, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> It's missing an important testcase; if it passes (does not warn), then
>> it should work:
>
> I think it does.

What I'm worried about is a false positive, not a false negative, so I'm 
afraid your test may not cover this.  I replied in the thread with 
Boqun's patches.

Paolo