[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8XAKvXSHuKF/uma@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 22:22:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Move the LFENCE_RDTSC / LFENCE
always serializing feature
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 01:15:29PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I don't think so.
>
> I'd be surprised if we don't have a _few_ other cases like this around,
> but nothing is coming to mind. Either way, it doesn't seem problematic.
Yeah, probably. The cases I remember are the other way around - we map
vendor-specific flags to synthetic ones...
Anyway, thanks for checking!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists