[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <972e4d0c69dea4e9659eb9459072b2b7b2fd963b.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:41:17 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>,
Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] LoongArch: Use trampoline for exception handlers
and kill la.abs
On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 09:30 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 2:38 PM Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Ruoyao and Youling,
> >
> > I care about the performance when NUMA enabled. We set CSR.EENTRY
> > for each possible cpus where is NUMA-relative. So, I guess the more
> > codes in NUMA-relative memory makes more performance. If we just set
> > handler_trampoline as exception handler, the performance may be
> > influenced.
> So copying both the handlers and handler_trampoline can solve the
> problem? If that is possible, please do that on top of the latest code
> in
> https://github.com/loongson/linux/commits/loongarch-next
Hi folks,
I just wrote the trampoline code as a PoC to show "relocatable kernel
can work" and there must be some better way. But I'm too sad to write
any serious code in this month, and I don't have access to a LoongArch
NUMA system. So I think it's better to leave the job for you guys now
:).
Best regards
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists