[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea718cd4-db3c-12a8-aac6-688d7189fbf9@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:17:43 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Moudy Ho (何宗原) <Moudy.Ho@...iatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v3 02/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: add MDP3 nodes
On 16/01/2023 10:14, Moudy Ho (何宗原) wrote:
>>> + mdp3-fg0@...02000 {
>>
>> Node names should be generic.
>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html*generic-names-recommendation__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!gmuIIk9pHTEGcVTtOXNeP3a8XUucoiTd5vTmxNK8lCHtytRDc3R8Eh44WOWNEUkJlv_pPCtg_DvPCHsCHNscg6_0cfJe$
>>
>>
>> "0" suffix is definitely nothing generic. Drop such suffixes
>> everywhere.
>> Drop also "mdp3" prefix everywhere.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> May I uniformly name all MediaTek's media data path ver.3(MDP3) nodes
> as "mdp3@xxx"?
No, because it does not describe generic class of a device. Some nodes
are probably quite specific, thus we do not have generic names for them,
but then any prefixes are also not neeeded. If node is image-scaler, it
is just image-scaler, not "mdp3-image-scaler". If node is video-codec it
is not mdp3-video-codec. etc.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists