linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/idle: Make idle poll dynamic per-cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8UYtEepRT3xC8O/@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:28:20 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/idle: Make idle poll dynamic per-cpu


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Urgh, can we please make this a cpuidle governor thing or so? So that 
> > we don't need to invent new interfaces and such.
> 
> I think the desired property here would be to make this interface on top 
> of pretty much any governor. Ie. have a governor, but also a way to drop 
> any CPU into idle-poll, overriding that.

... with the goal of having the best governor for power efficiency by 
default - but also the ability to drop a handful of CPUs into the highest 
performance / lowest latency idle mode.

It's a special kind of nested policy, for workload exceptions.

Thanks,

	Ingo