linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 1/7] mm: huge_memory: make __do_huge_pmd_anonymous

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:09:19 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/7] mm: huge_memory: make
 __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() to take a folio



On 2023/1/13 22:25, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:30:00PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> Let's __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() take a folio and convert related
>> functions to use folios.
> 
> No, this is actively wrong!  Andrew, please drop this patch.
> 
> If we want to support folio sizes larger than PMD size (and I think we
> do), we need to be able to specify precisely which page in the folio
> is to be stored at this PTE.  The *interface* must remain struct page.
> We can convert from page to folio within the function, but we *MUST NOT*
> go the other way.

Got it,

> 
>>   static vm_fault_t __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>> -			struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
>> +			struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp)
>>   {
>>   	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
>> +	struct page *page = &folio->page;
> 
> ... ie this is bad and wrong.
> 
>> @@ -834,7 +835,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>   		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
>>   		return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
>>   	}
>> -	return __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(vmf, &folio->page, gfp);
>> +	return __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(vmf, folio, gfp);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void insert_pfn_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> 
> A reasonable person might ask "But Matthew, you allocated a folio here,
> then you're converting back to a struct page to call
> __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() so isn't this a sensible patch?"

and this is why I change the parameter from page to folio(no need to go 
back and forth between page and folio),
> 
> And I would say "still no".  This is a question of interfaces, and
> even though __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() is static and has precisely
> one caller today that always allocates a folio of precisely PMD size,
> I suspect it will need to be more visible in the future and the
> conversion of the interface from page to folio misleads people.
ok, will keep page for __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page().
>