[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaxt87XnQ=QejN+XGb+s5q35FDKZoVa0=HMaK6G9_1d1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:41:35 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 510/606] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:52 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Thanks. Is there a reason you picked #510 but not #511 other than having
> missed there is a 2nd pinctrl patch in my series?
>
> If it's only that
>
> b4 am -P 511 -s -l CACRpkdaViC8T5qFRW+=+rGST=nr9beQJqTP7d42OoYUnhPhqig@...l.gmail.com
>
> is your friend.
My bad. I applied 511 above as well, helpful with the oneliner!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists