[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprNzLMnU7cguMit6Y4sgU0-SOkiiL+=s_BFBZiyvNvsAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:52:30 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
agross@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required:
vdds-supply' clause. WDYT?
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> index 9c9184f94c44..8e9031bbde73 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> - reg-names
> - - vdds-supply
>
> unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> --
> 2.39.0
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists