linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 40/53] KVM: s390: interrupt: use READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230116140154.114951-40-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:01:40 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 40/53] KVM: s390: interrupt: use READ_ONCE() before cmpxchg()

From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 42400d99e9f0728c17240edb9645637ead40f6b9 ]

Use READ_ONCE() before cmpxchg() to prevent that the compiler generates
code that fetches the to be compared old value several times from memory.

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230109145456.2895385-1-hca@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index ab569faf0df2..6d74acea5e85 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -83,8 +83,9 @@ static int sca_inject_ext_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int src_id)
 		struct esca_block *sca = vcpu->kvm->arch.sca;
 		union esca_sigp_ctrl *sigp_ctrl =
 			&(sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sigp_ctrl);
-		union esca_sigp_ctrl new_val = {0}, old_val = *sigp_ctrl;
+		union esca_sigp_ctrl new_val = {0}, old_val;
 
+		old_val = READ_ONCE(*sigp_ctrl);
 		new_val.scn = src_id;
 		new_val.c = 1;
 		old_val.c = 0;
@@ -95,8 +96,9 @@ static int sca_inject_ext_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int src_id)
 		struct bsca_block *sca = vcpu->kvm->arch.sca;
 		union bsca_sigp_ctrl *sigp_ctrl =
 			&(sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sigp_ctrl);
-		union bsca_sigp_ctrl new_val = {0}, old_val = *sigp_ctrl;
+		union bsca_sigp_ctrl new_val = {0}, old_val;
 
+		old_val = READ_ONCE(*sigp_ctrl);
 		new_val.scn = src_id;
 		new_val.c = 1;
 		old_val.c = 0;
@@ -126,16 +128,18 @@ static void sca_clear_ext_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		struct esca_block *sca = vcpu->kvm->arch.sca;
 		union esca_sigp_ctrl *sigp_ctrl =
 			&(sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sigp_ctrl);
-		union esca_sigp_ctrl old = *sigp_ctrl;
+		union esca_sigp_ctrl old;
 
+		old = READ_ONCE(*sigp_ctrl);
 		expect = old.value;
 		rc = cmpxchg(&sigp_ctrl->value, old.value, 0);
 	} else {
 		struct bsca_block *sca = vcpu->kvm->arch.sca;
 		union bsca_sigp_ctrl *sigp_ctrl =
 			&(sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sigp_ctrl);
-		union bsca_sigp_ctrl old = *sigp_ctrl;
+		union bsca_sigp_ctrl old;
 
+		old = READ_ONCE(*sigp_ctrl);
 		expect = old.value;
 		rc = cmpxchg(&sigp_ctrl->value, old.value, 0);
 	}
-- 
2.35.1