[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H768YCCdpn62tBAzbT0W24KNK-vnFnPDmMW-+X5_EdxgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:18:02 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] LoongArch: Use common function sign_extend64()
I queued this patch, but others need more reviews.
Huacai
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 5:27 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> There exists a common function sign_extend64() to sign extend a 64-bit
> value using specified bit as sign-bit in include/linux/bitops.h, it is
> more efficient, let us use it and remove the arch-specific sign_extend()
> under arch/loongarch.
>
> Suggested-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 8 --------
> arch/loongarch/kernel/alternative.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> index e0771d2..ba18ce8 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -397,14 +397,6 @@ static inline bool unsigned_imm_check(unsigned long val, unsigned int bit)
> return val < (1UL << bit);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long sign_extend(unsigned long val, unsigned int idx)
> -{
> - if (!is_imm_negative(val, idx + 1))
> - return ((1UL << idx) - 1) & val;
> - else
> - return ~((1UL << idx) - 1) | val;
> -}
> -
> #define DEF_EMIT_REG0I26_FORMAT(NAME, OP) \
> static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \
> int offset) \
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/alternative.c
> index c5aebea..4ad1384 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void __init_or_module recompute_jump(union loongarch_instruction *buf,
> switch (src->reg0i26_format.opcode) {
> case b_op:
> case bl_op:
> - jump_addr = cur_pc + sign_extend((si_h << 16 | si_l) << 2, 27);
> + jump_addr = cur_pc + sign_extend64((si_h << 16 | si_l) << 2, 27);
> if (in_alt_jump(jump_addr, start, end))
> return;
> offset = jump_addr - pc;
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void __init_or_module recompute_jump(union loongarch_instruction *buf,
> fallthrough;
> case beqz_op:
> case bnez_op:
> - jump_addr = cur_pc + sign_extend((si_h << 16 | si_l) << 2, 22);
> + jump_addr = cur_pc + sign_extend64((si_h << 16 | si_l) << 2, 22);
> if (in_alt_jump(jump_addr, start, end))
> return;
> offset = jump_addr - pc;
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void __init_or_module recompute_jump(union loongarch_instruction *buf,
> case bge_op:
> case bltu_op:
> case bgeu_op:
> - jump_addr = cur_pc + sign_extend(si << 2, 17);
> + jump_addr = cur_pc + sign_extend64(si << 2, 17);
> if (in_alt_jump(jump_addr, start, end))
> return;
> offset = jump_addr - pc;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists