linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 07/17] arm64/mm: Define dummy pud_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230116140448.116034-7-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:04:38 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, catalin.marinas@....com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
        wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, liushixin2@...wei.com,
        david@...hat.com, tongtiangen@...wei.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 07/17] arm64/mm: Define dummy pud_user_exec() when using 2-level page-table

From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit 4e4ff23a35ee3a145fbc8378ecfeaab2d235cddd ]

With only two levels of page-table, the generic 'pud_*' macros are
implemented using dummy operations in pgtable-nopmd.h. Since commit
730a11f982e6 ("arm64/mm: add pud_user_exec() check in
pud_user_accessible_page()"), pud_user_accessible_page() unconditionally
calls pud_user_exec(), which is an arm64-specific helper and therefore
isn't defined by pgtable-nopmd.h. This results in a build failure for
configurations with only two levels of page table:

   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'pud_user_accessible_page':
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:870:51: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_user_exec'; did you mean 'pmd_user_exec'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     870 |         return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
         |                                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                                   pmd_user_exec

Fix the problem by defining pud_user_exec() as pud_user() in this case.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202301080515.z6zEksU4-lkp@intel.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 3f74db7b0a31..67f33df4006a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pud_page_vaddr(pud_t pud)
 #else
 
 #define pud_page_paddr(pud)	({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
+#define pud_user_exec(pud)	pud_user(pud) /* Always 0 with folding */
 
 /* Match pmd_offset folding in <asm/generic/pgtable-nopmd.h> */
 #define pmd_set_fixmap(addr)		NULL
-- 
2.35.1