linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Avoid duplicate Kconfig inclusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOFdcFNKJacBVtrV-hJyUu6hKBVFaKdpA84cZ6WGnZ=ZGnb4kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 15 Jan 2023 16:42:05 -0800
From:   Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Avoid duplicate Kconfig inclusion

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 8:25 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> The duplicate inclusion does seem worth fixing, but I wonder if you're
> deleting the right one?  Having the documentation Kconfig under lib
> seems a bit strange, somehow; Documentation/ is a top-level directory,
> after all.

I thought about that.
Looking at the history, the toplevel inclusion was added in
b1663d7e3a7961 (2019-06-04), and the lib/Kconfig.debug inclusion was
added in 75442fb0ccaacd (2020-10-30).
Given the actual entries in Documentation/Kconfig
(WARN_MISSING_DOCUMENTS and WARN_ABI_ERRORS), putting them under the
"Kernel hacking" menu makes sense to me.
We *could* add a new top-level menu to Documentation/Kconfig, but it
doesn't really seem like an improvement over having them live in
Kernel hacking.