[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230117193109.5650fd6f@nz>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:31:09 +0000
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
matoro <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@...oro.tk>,
Émeric Maschino <emeric.maschino@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label
appearing next to declaration
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:16:32 +0000
James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
> Since commit aa06a9bd8533 ("ia64: fix clock_getres(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) to
> report ITC frequency"), gcc 10.1.0 fails to build ia64 with the gnomic:
> | ../arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c: In function 'ia64_clock_getres':
> | ../arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:189:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
> | 189 | s64 tick_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, local_cpu_data->itc_freq);
>
> This line appears immediately after a case label in a switch.
>
> Move the declarations out of the case, to the top of the function.
>
> Fixes: aa06a9bd8533 ("ia64: fix clock_getres(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) to report ITC frequency")
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Out of curiosity what compiler version behaves like that? I think I and
matoro build-/run-tested it on gcc-12 and maybe gcc-11.
Thank you!
Reviewed-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
> ---
> Found when build testing another series.
> I've only build tested this.
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c
> index f6a502e8f02c..6e948d015332 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ ia64_mremap (unsigned long addr, unsigned long old_len, unsigned long new_len, u
> asmlinkage long
> ia64_clock_getres(const clockid_t which_clock, struct __kernel_timespec __user *tp)
> {
> + struct timespec64 rtn_tp;
> + s64 tick_ns;
> +
> /*
> * ia64's clock_gettime() syscall is implemented as a vdso call
> * fsys_clock_gettime(). Currently it handles only
> @@ -185,8 +188,8 @@ ia64_clock_getres(const clockid_t which_clock, struct __kernel_timespec __user *
> switch (which_clock) {
> case CLOCK_REALTIME:
> case CLOCK_MONOTONIC:
> - s64 tick_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, local_cpu_data->itc_freq);
> - struct timespec64 rtn_tp = ns_to_timespec64(tick_ns);
> + tick_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, local_cpu_data->itc_freq);
> + rtn_tp = ns_to_timespec64(tick_ns);
> return put_timespec64(&rtn_tp, tp);
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists