[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d238f02-4d78-6f14-1b1b-f53f0317a910@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:37:35 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
Michael Karcher <kernel@...rcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: Calculating array sizes in C - was: Re: Build
regressions/improvements in v6.2-rc1
Hi!
On 1/17/23 21:05, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Isn't this supposed to be caught by this check:
>>
>> a, __same_type(a, NULL)
>>
>> ?
>
> Yeah, but gcc thinks it is smarter than us...
> Probably it drops the test, assuming UB cannot happen.
Hmm, sounds like a GGC bug to me then. Not sure how to fix this then.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists