[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez2Adwqs8Vvm3YUKwpx8qzV1wWtnUdWVo1UphjzADjMZQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:28:06 +0100
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
michel@...pinasse.org, jglisse@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, dave@...olabs.net,
willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@...ibm.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com,
peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
peterjung1337@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, tatashin@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
gthelen@...gle.com, gurua@...gle.com, arjunroy@...gle.com,
soheil@...gle.com, hughlynch@...gle.com, leewalsh@...gle.com,
posk@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/41] mm/khugepaged: write-lock VMA while collapsing a
huge page
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:25 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:13, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Protect VMA from concurrent page fault handler while collapsing a huge
> > page. Page fault handler needs a stable PMD to use PTL and relies on
> > per-VMA lock to prevent concurrent PMD changes. pmdp_collapse_flush(),
> > set_huge_pmd() and collapse_and_free_pmd() can modify a PMD, which will
> > not be detected by a page fault handler without proper locking.
>
> I am struggling with this changelog. Maybe because my recollection of
> the THP collapsing subtleties is weak. But aren't you just trying to say
> that the current #PF handling and THP collapsing need to be mutually
> exclusive currently so in order to keep that assumption you have mark
> the vma write locked?
>
> Also it is not really clear to me how that handles other vmas which can
> share the same thp?
It's not about the hugepage itself, it's about how the THP collapse
operation frees page tables.
Before this series, page tables can be walked under any one of the
mmap lock, the mapping lock, and the anon_vma lock; so when khugepaged
unlinks and frees page tables, it must ensure that all of those either
are locked or don't exist. This series adds a fourth lock under which
page tables can be traversed, and so khugepaged must also lock out that one.
There is a codepath in khugepaged that iterates through all mappings
of a file to zap page tables (retract_page_tables()), which locks each
visited mm with mmap_write_trylock() and now also does
vma_write_lock().
I think one aspect of this patch that might cause trouble later on, if
support for non-anonymous VMAs is added, is that retract_page_tables()
now does vma_write_lock() while holding the mapping lock; the page
fault handling path would probably take the locks the other way
around, leading to a deadlock? So the vma_write_lock() in
retract_page_tables() might have to become a trylock later on.
Related: Please add the new VMA lock to the big lock ordering comments
at the top of mm/rmap.c. (And maybe later mm/filemap.c, if/when you
add file VMA support.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists