[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90f1270d-3c37-088b-98ac-a08caba685e8@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:01:17 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: battery: Fix buffer overread if not
NUL-terminated
Am 17.01.23 um 15:42 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 9:51 AM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de> wrote:
>> If the buffer containing string data is not NUL-terminated
>> (which is perfectly legal according to the ACPI specification),
>> the acpi battery driver might not honor its length.
> Note that this is about extracting package entries of type ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER.
>
> And please spell ACPI in capitals.
>
>> Fix this by limiting the amount of data to be copied to
>> the buffer length while also using strscpy() to make sure
>> that the resulting string is always NUL-terminated.
> OK
>
>> Also use '\0' instead of a plain 0.
> Why? It's a u8, not a char.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>> index fb64bd217d82..9f6daa9f2010 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>> @@ -438,15 +438,24 @@ static int extract_package(struct acpi_battery *battery,
>> if (offsets[i].mode) {
>> u8 *ptr = (u8 *)battery + offsets[i].offset;
> I would add
>
> u32 len = 32;
>
>> - if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING ||
>> - element->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
>> + switch (element->type) {
> And here I would do
>
> case ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER:
> if (len > element->buffer.length + 1)
> len = element->buffer.length + 1;
>
> fallthrough;
> case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
> strscpy(ptr, element->buffer.pointer, len);
> break;
> case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
>
> and so on.
But wouldn't this cause the ACPI string object to be accessed the wrong way
(buffer.pointer instead of string.pointer)?
Armin Wolf
>> + case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
>> strscpy(ptr, element->string.pointer, 32);
>> - else if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
>> - strncpy(ptr, (u8 *)&element->integer.value,
>> - sizeof(u64));
>> +
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER:
>> + strscpy(ptr, element->buffer.pointer,
>> + min_t(u32, element->buffer.length + 1, 32));
>> +
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
>> + strncpy(ptr, (u8 *)&element->integer.value, sizeof(u64));
>> ptr[sizeof(u64)] = 0;
>> - } else
>> - *ptr = 0; /* don't have value */
>> +
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + *ptr = '\0'; /* don't have value */
>> + }
>> } else {
>> int *x = (int *)((u8 *)battery + offsets[i].offset);
>> *x = (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) ?
>> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists