linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0305F1B0-4726-4529-9A6F-517D299851DF@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:29:08 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
CC:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
        Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC



On 17 January 2023 02:38:11 GMT, Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 19:30:05 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> Hey Hal Feng,
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:55:24AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
>> > This patch series adds basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 SoC.
>> > You can simply get or review the patches at the link [1].
>> 
>> > [1]: https://github.com/hal-feng/linux/commits/visionfive2-minimal
>> 
>> Do you intend submitting a new version of the patchset to address the
>> comments about the bindings, or are you waiting for comments on the
>> code?
>
>Sorry for the late reply. If no other comments, I will fix the current
>known issues and submit a new version. Actually, I am busy with some
>other things recently, and I will reply the comments as soon as possible.

no worries.
Just FYI, it'd be good to choose something like v6.2-rc1 as a base.
Looks like some header changes have landed
that make the current version not compile 

Thanks,
Conor.