linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Update the maxitems number of resets and reset-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8ee5f6ef-80cb-2e0f-6681-598ccc697291@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 08:46:05 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     yanhong wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Update the maxitems
 number of resets and reset-names

On 17/01/2023 07:52, yanhong wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/1/6 20:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/01/2023 03:59, Yanhong Wang wrote:
>>> Some boards(such as StarFive VisionFive v2) require more than one value
>>> which defined by resets property, so the original definition can not
>>> meet the requirements. In order to adapt to different requirements,
>>> adjust the maxitems number definition.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml   | 36 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> index e26c3e76ebb7..f7693e8c8d6d 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> @@ -132,14 +132,6 @@ properties:
>>>          - pclk
>>>          - ptp_ref
>>>  
>>> -  resets:
>>> -    maxItems: 1
>>> -    description:
>>> -      MAC Reset signal.
>>> -
>>> -  reset-names:
>>> -    const: stmmaceth
>>> -
>>>    power-domains:
>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>  
>>> @@ -463,6 +455,34 @@ allOf:
>>>              Enables the TSO feature otherwise it will be managed by
>>>              MAC HW capability register.
>>>  
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            const: starfive,jh7110-dwmac
>>> +
>>
>> Looking at your next binding patch, this seems a bit clearer. First of
>> all, this patch on itself has little sense. It's not usable on its own,
>> because you need the next one.
>>
>> Probably the snps,dwmac should be just split into common parts used by
>> devices. It makes code much less readable and unnecessary complicated to
>> support in one schema both devices and re-usability.
>>
>> Otherwise I propose to make the resets/reset-names just like clocks are
>> made: define here wide constraints and update all other users of this
>> binding to explicitly restrict resets.
>>
>>
> 
> Thanks, refer to the definition of clocks. If it is defined as follows, is it OK?
> 
> properties:
>   resets:
>     minItems: 1
>     maxItems: 3
>     additionalItems: true

Drop

>     items:
>       - description: MAC Reset signal.

Drop both

> 
>   reset-names:
>     minItems: 1
>     maxItems: 3
>     additionalItems: true

Drop

>     contains:
>       enum:
>         - stmmaceth

Drop all

> 
> 
> allOf:
>   - if:
>       properties:
>         compatible:
>           contains:
>             const: starfive,jh7110-dwmac
>     then:
>       properties:
>         resets:
>           minItems: 2
>           maxItems: 2
>         reset-names:
>           items:
>             - const: stmmaceth
>             - const: ahb
>       required:
>         - resets
>         - reset-names  
>     else:
>       properties:
>         resets:
>           maxItems: 1
>           description:
>             MAC Reset signal.
> 
>         reset-names:
>           const: stmmaceth
> 
> Do you have any other better suggestions?

More or less like this but the allOf should not be in snps,dwmac schema
but in individual schemas. The snps,dwmac is growing unmaintainable...

Best regards,
Krzysztof