[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bd25e86-37c9-e2c5-d957-2ed111a3f4a7@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:09:25 +0530
From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <srk@...com>,
<s-vadapalli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add cpsw3g cpts
PPS support
Roger,
On 17/01/23 15:00, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 17/01/2023 07:28, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Vignesh,
>>
>> On 16/01/23 22:00, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/01/23 9:35 pm, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts
>>>>>>> index 4f179b146cab..962a922cc94b 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts
>>>>>>> @@ -366,6 +366,10 @@ &cpsw3g {
>>>>>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>>>> pinctrl-0 = <&main_rgmii1_pins_default
>>>>>>> &main_rgmii2_pins_default>;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + cpts@...00 {
>>>>>>> + ti,pps = <2 1>;
>>>>>>> + };
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> &cpsw_port1 {
>>>>>>> @@ -464,3 +468,19 @@ partition@...0000 {
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#define TS_OFFSET(pa, val) (0x4+(pa)*4) (0x10000 | val)
>>>>>> Should this go in ./include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/k3.h ?
>>>>>> That way every board DT file doesn't have to define it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The name should be made more platform specific.
>>>>>> e.g. K3_TS_OFFSET if it is the same for all K3 platforms.
>>>>>> If not then please add Platform name instead of K3.
>>>>> The offsets are board specific. If it is acceptable, I will add board specific
>>>>> macro for the TS_OFFSET definition in the ./include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/k3.h
>>>>> file. Please let me know.
>>>> If it is board specific then it should remain in the board file.
>>>
>>>
>>> The values you pass to macro maybe board specific. But the macro
>>> definition itself same for a given SoC right? Also, is its same across
>>> K3 family ?
>>>
>
> I misunderstood then. I agree with Vignesh.
>
>>> Please use SoC specific prefix like AM62X_TS_OFFSET() or K3_TS_OFFSET()
>>> accordingly.
>>
>> For certain SoCs including AM62X, the macro is:
>> #define TS_OFFSET(pa, val) (0x4+(pa)*4) (0x10000 | val)
>> while for other SoCs (refer [0]), the macro is:
>> #define TS_OFFSET(pa, val) (0x4+(pa)*4) (0x80000000 | val)
>>
>> Therefore, I will use SoC specific prefix in the macro. Please let me know if
>> the SoC specific macro can be added to the ./include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/k3.h
>> file for each SoC. If not, I will add the SoC specific macro in the board file
>> itself.
>
> Not in board file please. It should go in ./include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/k3.h
Thank you for letting me know. I will do so in the device-tree series that I
will post once the bindings and driver patches get merged.
The v2 series for the bindings and driver patches that I am referring to is at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116085534.440820-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
Regards,
Siddharth.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists